Why Do So Many Still Use 36Fps?
#46
Posted Feb 26 2012 - 10:43 PM
Been there, done that.
My main interest is hunting and fly fishing now. I'm enjoying my retirement. GPL is a way for me to relax when I get a chance. I don't want to be locked into a schedule to race.
I understand your passion though. I had it once too.
#48
Posted Feb 27 2012 - 02:45 AM
I think that every one is free to do what he prefers, I only like to play GPL above 200 FPS...end of discussion
I always say, we all have the same hobby so whats the use of fighting against each other
My own tiny story:
To be honest I did not race that much ONLINE, I did not have much time left to do so...guys who knows me around here knows the reason...I did run a Website with many RACE-GAME-LINKS-GUIDES GPL, GTR2, rFactor and many more to make my contribution to the race-community. (many years)
It have cost me a lot of years and many hours of my own spare time.
I also have helped a lot of guys tweaking there race-sims at RacesimCentral. (to get enough FPS for instance)
What I want to say, there are more ways to make a contribution to for instance GPL, have a look also at good old Bob Simpson
Have fun !!!!
Hansje
Edited by hansje, Feb 27 2012 - 03:08 AM.
#49
Posted Feb 27 2012 - 07:03 AM
JohnnyAck, on Feb 26 2012 - 09:58 PM, said:
@JohnnyAck:
Keep in mind that many others who enjoy GPL very much also work long hours, and also have children, heavy schedules, and multiple significant time commitments to family and to their community as well. I do not often know in advance when I can schedule an hour or more for a full GPL race; instead I work it in when I can.
We all enjoy GPL or we would not be belaboring this point. Please do not criticize others who don't race online, for whatever the reason. There is room for all of us here, and how we spend our time with GPL is nobody's business but our own.
I'm glad you are able to spend time with GPL racing online, but your life and priorities are not the same as mine. We both have fun anyway.
#50
Posted Feb 27 2012 - 04:47 PM
For me, the 60fps AI dart quickly from side to side ... sort of hurts the immersion factor.
To me, the difference visually is dramatic on my 24" LCD ... mostly around the edge of the screen. However, while racing, my attention isn't focused around the edge of the screen, and I have no problems switching between the SimBin series.
Perhaps it's an age thing. To those of us who drove the "original" graphic settings for years, those first graphic improvements from Bruce Johnson and the GPLEA were astonishing.
I would assume that most people acquiring the game now go directly to the improved tracks and cars. So for them, 36 fps seems pretty, well, "bad".
As a kid growing up, my friends played Strat-O-Matic baseball ... a game with paper cards that you flipped over for results.
And in college, my friends played a hand-held form of electric football ... where you manuevered a red LED light through a group of "on-rushing" LED lights. Talk about lame graphics!
Given the near TV-quality of the graphics presented by PS3 and XBox360, my kids would just laugh at those old games!
#51
Posted Feb 29 2012 - 07:42 AM
#52
Posted Feb 29 2012 - 08:49 AM
Andy Clegg, on Feb 29 2012 - 07:42 AM, said:
Yeah, if you can't get consistent 60fps when using the patch, then you're better off using 36fps. 60 fps only runs smooth when you can get that frame rate. 45 fps with the patch won't be as smooth as 36fps without the patch.
Dave
#53
Posted Feb 29 2012 - 10:03 AM
#54
Posted Feb 29 2012 - 11:56 AM
Another problem, I guess, are the replays that are a half speed.
Cheers, Marcos
#55
Posted Mar 01 2012 - 12:54 AM
dbell84, on Feb 29 2012 - 08:49 AM, said:
Andy Clegg, on Feb 29 2012 - 07:42 AM, said:
Yeah, if you can't get consistent 60fps when using the patch, then you're better off using 36fps. 60 fps only runs smooth when you can get that frame rate. 45 fps with the patch won't be as smooth as 36fps without the patch.
Dave
My pc isn't powerful enough to have a constant 60fps, and once I drop "under", the "stutters" are too problematic with many cars on the track!
However, I can also enjoy the 60fps when I "hotlap" on a "friendly track" (concerning the fps). The 60fps patch is, indeed, "smoother"; but with a steady 36fps my GPL runs like a charm too!
I'm not "for or against" the 60fps patch, but because my pc can't do "better", I'm not asking it what it can't do...
Intruder
#56
Posted Mar 01 2012 - 02:01 AM
#57
Posted Mar 01 2012 - 02:39 PM
jgf, on Feb 26 2012 - 11:59 PM, said:
#58
Posted Mar 02 2012 - 03:13 PM
If there were less diversity and less choice there would be less GPL or none at all. Making a choice does not separate GPLers. It is this circumstance that joins us all.
There are three sins imo.
Arrogance, ignorance, and greed.
Grand Prix Legends has enjoyed a community of fans and contributors that demonstrate the exact opposite: humility, intelligence, and generosity. (Except for my particular sometimes really big head, of course).
It is all very often too amazing. But you have to had been there to be amazed...like when we discovered night tracks, rain, and fog, Clermont came out, or Sergio pumped out yet another...and it keeps on going. Waiting for something new is a big part of being a part of GPL, but now there is no way to spend enough time on every track and mod to get as good on them as when there were so few.
Looking back, to the extent making choices separates any GPLer from any other, it is apparent all along our choices, (among the widest range of choice of any race sim), has been the case since day one, as a range of game-changing config choice is built-in, and the first add-on divided us among those who used it and those who didn't.
Compliments and thanks to those who have posted here so far.
#59
Posted Mar 02 2012 - 03:16 PM
#60
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











